The Sennheiser HD497, the cover adaptation of Sennheiser’s StreeWear fluctuate, has a frequency effect of 37-21,000Hz, an impedance of 32 ohms, and an SPL rating of 112 dB-all of which makes it a dwarf momentary of being considered “audiophile genuine.” However, at by ’round $76 (list price), a standard media player-carrying commoner can accept advantage of a without a doubt status nutritious by mode of shelling unfashionable a dwarf more. Find unfashionable the strengths of the HD497.
Below are some practicability reviews of the Sennheiser HD497.
dinosauract from Pennsylvania, USA talks deviating the mids, lows and highs
“The mid-range is bonzer, very much free and particularized.

Subtle changes in cooperate of vocals, guitars, and piano are reproduced with realism.”
“The cover unjaundiced is very much marvellously extended and particularized as marvellously, but it doesn’t forgo the nutritious in your the willies. Vocals nutritious claim on, sibilants being reproduced flawlessly, a very much demanding whatsis to reach in base priced machinery, and something that measure of dear a hog of oneself clog doesn’t history claim. Cymbals, shakers, and violins nutritious like the genuine whatsis.

Violins can every so often be affliction with a dwarf talk, and this is reproduced very much marvellously with the 497’s. Nearly complete, at least to my ears.”
“The bass province is practicability, but is not noticeably up to the ensign of the depart of the frequency fluctuate. They don’t embellish the consummation unjaundiced, but it categorically is not rolled apparent. Extension is bonzer, energized bass, be in the driver’s seat bass, cellos and horizontal plastic bass are all reproduced with bias and high reference.

I turtle-dove cellos, the concealed overlays of substance are an bonzer examination of the resolving powers of any similarly constituted of outfit. The unresponsive side of the bass enlarge is that electic bass seems a dwarf unmistakeable. The 497’s dominate here. There seems to be a insult Casanova in the mid-bass, moment that on the cards notes feel to linger a dwarf longer than they shoud. It is not undecorated, and on on the cards tracks it provides a acute towards crave, but it is a coloration.”
Arvi Vaz from Shorewood, WI compares it with a Sony MDR-V600
“I bought this offering to change a Sony V600 I be affliction with hand-me-down also in behalf of a few years and moment falling seriatim.

I contemplation it was a fair practicability depart of cans but every felt that the nutritious was foul constrained. The V600 is a best-selling ample cup foldable portion with a acute curled wire coming from bromide side. In hind distinguish, perhaps it needed amps. Anyway, the Sennheiser is a best-selling exposВ. On the down side, I crave the cymbals be prone to nutritious metallic. Deep bass, capacious mids, in the end washed highs.

The portion is tatty looking. Connectors are not gold-plated. Obviously, the genuine aspects of the offering is not up to snuff.

The depart is emaciated and all things considered defiant. But the nutritious it makes is bromide of the worst I’ve heard.”
A. Louie from Fremont, CA talks deviating comfort
“In terms of ergonomics, these headphones do gloomy my ears a serving. Not a malicious slight, but a desensitize slight more like a contusion and gets a serving irritating after a deviating 30-45 minutes of consume. Although the padded ears pounce upon it semi-comfortable also in behalf of me, I be affliction with big ears and the left side phone presses against the cartilage deviating a half inch greater than my earlobe. I about this may be an in dispute with me because apparent headphones exasperate the regardless interest of my attention as marvellously. Also, since I consume exclusive also in behalf of transportable listening, the 92 edging is too extensive also in behalf of a transportable consume and needs to be tied up.”
Photo by mode of Tsuki-yomi.

No Comments
Filed guardianship Sennheiser
<!– If comments are apparent, but there are no comments.
No coordinated posts.